A political radicalization framework based on Moral Foundations Theory
Ruben Interian

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel framework based on Moral Foundations Theory to measure online community radicalization by analyzing interaction behaviors and network structures, revealing increased isolation and extremism in radicalized groups.
Contribution
It presents a data-driven method linking social network structure to moral foundations, enabling the detection of radicalized communities through behavioral and structural features.
Findings
Radicalized communities show increased isolation and domination.
Individuals share more extreme content than they publish.
Extreme views receive more likes on social media.
Abstract
Moral Foundations Theory proposes that individuals with conflicting political views base their behavior on different principles chosen from a small group of universal moral foundations. This study proposes using a set of widely accepted moral foundations (Fairness, Ingroup loyalty, Authority, and Purity) as proxies to determine the degree of radicalization of online communities. The fifth principle, Care, is generally surpassed by others, which are higher in the radicalized groups' moral hierarchy. Moreover, the presented data-driven methodological framework proposes an alternative way to measure whether a community complies with some moral principle or foundation: not evaluating its speech, but its behavior through interactions of its individuals, establishing a bridge between structural features of the interaction network and the intensity of communities' radicalization regarding the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
