
TL;DR
This paper explores convex choice in multidimensional Euclidean spaces, linking it to local incentive constraints and showing its implications for expected-utility preferences and multidimensional mechanism design.
Contribution
It characterizes convex choice via local incentive constraints and connects it to directional single-crossing differences, advancing understanding in multidimensional mechanism design.
Findings
Convex choice characterizes the sufficiency of local incentive constraints.
DSCD implies preferences are either one-dimensional or affine.
The work provides a new perspective on multidimensional mechanism design.
Abstract
For multidimensional Euclidean type spaces, we study convex choice: from any choice set, the set of types that make the same choice is convex. We establish that, in a suitable sense, this property characterizes the sufficiency of local incentive constraints. Convex choice is also of interest more broadly. We tie convex choice to a notion of directional single-crossing differences (DSCD). For an expected-utility agent choosing among lotteries, DSCD implies that preferences are either one-dimensional or must take the affine form that has been tractable in multidimensional mechanism design.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical Economics and Policy
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
