Resonant sub-Neptunes are puffier
Adrien Leleu, Jean-Baptiste Delisle, Remo Burn, Andr\'e Izidoro,, St\'ephane Udry, Xavier Dumusque, Christophe Lovis, Sarah Millholland, L\'ena, Parc, Fran\c{c}ois Bouchy, Vincent Bourrier, Yann Alibert, Jo\~ao Faria,, Christoph Mordasini, Damien S\'egransan

TL;DR
This study reveals that resonant sub-Neptunes tend to be puffier and less dense than non-resonant ones, with density and orbital properties influenced by their resonant state, supported by observational data and synthetic population models.
Contribution
It demonstrates a clear link between resonance and planetary density, highlighting the importance of resonant configurations in planetary system formation and evolution.
Findings
Resonant planets are generally less dense and more co-planar.
Density depends strongly on the system's resonant state.
Synthetic models support observational trends and evolutionary scenarios.
Abstract
A systematic, population-level discrepancy exists between the densities of exoplanets whose masses have been measured with transit timing variations (TTVs) versus those measured with radial velocities (RVs). Since the TTV planets are predominantly nearly resonant, it is still unclear whether the discrepancy is attributed to detection biases or to astrophysical differences between the nearly resonant and non resonant planet populations. We defined a controlled, unbiased sample of 36 sub-Neptunes characterised by Kepler, TESS, HARPS, and ESPRESSO. We found that their density depends mostly on the resonant state of the system, with a low probability (of ) that the mass of (nearly) resonant planets is drawn from the same underlying population as the bulk of sub-Neptunes. Increasing the sample to 133 sub-Neptunes reveals finer details: the densities of resonant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
