Probing the effects of broken symmetries in machine learning
Marcel F. Langer, Sergey N. Pozdnyakov, and Michele Ceriotti

TL;DR
This paper investigates the impact of approximate rotational symmetry in machine learning models for physical systems, finding minimal effects in many scenarios and discussing methods to mitigate symmetry breaking.
Contribution
It demonstrates that models with approximate rotational invariance perform well in physical predictions, challenging the necessity of strict symmetry enforcement in all cases.
Findings
Negligible effects of symmetry breaking in interpolative regimes
Model stability in gas-phase extrapolations despite symmetry artifacts
Strategies to reduce symmetry breaking improve observable convergence
Abstract
Symmetry is one of the most central concepts in physics, and it is no surprise that it has also been widely adopted as an inductive bias for machine-learning models applied to the physical sciences. This is especially true for models targeting the properties of matter at the atomic scale. Both established and state-of-the-art approaches, with almost no exceptions, are built to be exactly equivariant to translations, permutations, and rotations of the atoms. Incorporating symmetries -- rotations in particular -- constrains the model design space and implies more complicated architectures that are often also computationally demanding. There are indications that non-symmetric models can easily learn symmetries from data, and that doing so can even be beneficial for the accuracy of the model. We put a model that obeys rotational invariance only approximately to the test, in realistic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Physics and Python Applications
MethodsFocus
