Stellar s-process neutron capture cross section of Ce isotopes

TL;DR

This study re-measured the stellar neutron capture cross sections of cerium isotopes to address discrepancies in astrophysical models and observed abundances, providing more accurate nuclear data for stellar nucleosynthesis.

Contribution

The paper presents new experimental measurements of Ce isotope neutron capture cross sections at stellar energies, refining previous data and reducing uncertainties in astrophysical models.

Findings

MACS for $^{140}$Ce is about 15% smaller than recent values.

Results are consistent with previous measurements, improving data reliability.

Enhanced understanding of cerium nucleosynthesis in stars.

Abstract

Stellar abundances of cerium are of high current interest based both on observations and theoretical models, especially with regard to the neutron--magic $^{140}$Ce isotope. A large discrepancy of $s-$process stellar models relative to cerium abundance observed in globular clusters was highlighted, pointing to possible uncertainties in experimental nuclear reaction rates. In this work, the stellar neutron capture cross section of the stable cerium isotopes $^{136}$Ce, $^{138}$Ce, $^{140}$Ce, and $^{142}$Ce, were re-measured. A $^{nat}$Ce sample was irradiated with quasi-Maxwellian neutrons at $kT = 34.2$ keV using the $^{7}$Li($p,n$) reaction. The neutron field with an intensity of $3-5 \times 10^{10}$ n/s was produced by irradiating the liquid-lithium target (LiLiT) with a mA proton beam at an energy (1.92 MeV) just above the threshold at Soreq Applied Research Accelerator Facility (SARAF). The activities of the $^{nat}$Ce neutron capture products were measured using a shielded High Purity Germanium detector. Cross sections were extracted relative to that of the $^{197}$Au(n,$\gamma$) reaction and the Maxwellian-averaged cross section (MACS) of the Ce isotopes were derived. The MACS values extracted from this experiment are generally consistent with previous measurements and show for $^{140}$Ce a value $\approx 15$\% smaller than most recent experimental values.