Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
Simone Astarita, Sandor Kruk, Jan Reerink, Pablo G\'omez

TL;DR
This study investigates the increasing use of ChatGPT in astronomy research papers by analyzing word frequency trends in published articles, highlighting its widespread adoption and urging ethical guidelines.
Contribution
It introduces a method to detect ChatGPT's influence in scientific writing by analyzing word usage trends in astronomy publications from 2000 to 2024.
Findings
Significant increase in ChatGPT-favored words in 2024
Widespread adoption of language models in astronomy papers
Trend consistent with other scientific disciplines
Abstract
Rapid progress in the capabilities of machine learning approaches in natural language processing has culminated in the rise of large language models over the last two years. Recent works have shown unprecedented adoption of these for academic writing, especially in some fields, but their pervasiveness in astronomy has not been studied sufficiently. To remedy this, we extract words that ChatGPT uses more often than humans when generating academic text and search a total of 1 million articles for them. This way, we assess the frequency of word occurrence in published works in astronomy tracked by the NASA Astrophysics Data System since 2000. We then perform a statistical analysis of the occurrences. We identify a list of words favoured by ChatGPT and find a statistically significant increase for these words against a control group in 2024, which matches the trend in other disciplines.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
