Can Quantum Computers Do Nothing?
Alexander Nico-Katz, Nathan Keenan, John Goold

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scalable protocol to quantify information loss during qubit idling in quantum computers, validated through extensive experiments on IBM's Falcon processors, providing insights into the protection-operation dilemma.
Contribution
It develops a novel, device-agnostic information-theoretic protocol for measuring idle information leakage in quantum processors, validated through large-scale experiments.
Findings
Detected significant idle information leakage in quantum processors.
Validated the protocol across 3500 experiments on IBM Falcon hardware.
Provided a quantitative foundation for addressing the protection-operation dilemma.
Abstract
Quantum computing platforms are subject to contradictory engineering requirements: qubits must be protected from mutual interactions when idling ('doing nothing'), and strongly interacting when in operation. If idling qubits are not sufficiently protected, information can 'leak' into neighbouring qubits, become non-locally distributed, and ultimately inaccessible. Candidate solutions to this dilemma include patterning-enhanced many-body localization, dynamical decoupling, and active error correction. However, no information-theoretic protocol exists to actually quantify this information loss due to internal dynamics in a similar way to e.g. SPAM errors or dephasing times. In this work, we develop a scalable, flexible, device non-specific protocol for quantifying this bitwise idle information loss based on the exploitation of tools from quantum information theory. We implement this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
