Link Prediction with Untrained Message Passing Layers
Lisi Qarkaxhija, Anatol E. Wegner, Ingo Scholtes

TL;DR
This paper investigates untrained message passing layers in graph neural networks for link prediction, demonstrating they can perform competitively or better than trained models, especially with high-dimensional features, and provides a theoretical interpretation.
Contribution
It introduces untrained message passing layers for GNNs, showing their effectiveness and interpretability in link prediction tasks without requiring training.
Findings
Untrained message passing layers can outperform trained GNNs in link prediction.
High-dimensional features enhance the performance of untrained layers.
Theoretical analysis relates untrained features to topological similarity measures.
Abstract
Message passing neural networks (MPNNs) operate on graphs by exchanging information between neigbouring nodes. MPNNs have been successfully applied to various node-, edge-, and graph-level tasks in areas like molecular science, computer vision, natural language processing, and combinatorial optimization. However, most MPNNs require training on large amounts of labeled data, which can be costly and time-consuming. In this work, we explore the use of various untrained message passing layers in graph neural networks, i.e. variants of popular message passing architecture where we remove all trainable parameters that are used to transform node features in the message passing step. Focusing on link prediction, we find that untrained message passing layers can lead to competitive and even superior performance compared to fully trained MPNNs, especially in the presence of high-dimensional…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
Using untrained message passing layers for GNN can be a computationally efficient approach, which is an important topic in the community.
Weakness: Overall, the presented work gives the impression of an early draft, and I find it challenging to fully assess its contributions in its current form. Below are some clear issues: 1. The presented “theoretical results” are poorly organized, and it is very challenging to judge its correctness given there is no clear distinction between the authors’ contributions and existing results. To be honest, I am not very sure what is the theoretical contributions provided by the authors. The resu
The paper is written well and the presentation is good. The analysis of the inter layer values to path-based measures is nice, though not unexpected. Experimental results have been carried out on the usual link prediction benchmarks.
The idea of untrained and linear layers (as acknowledged by the authors) has previously appeared for node classification in Wu et al, ICML 2019. So, the idea has limited novelty. The assumption of orthogonality may not always hold especially under conditions of homophily where neighboring nodes have similar features. Link prediction has been studied in many works and the impact of another paper is limited.
* To the best of my knowledge, this is the first application of untrained message-passing layers to link prediction. * The empirical results show that untrained layers perform reasonably well. * Some theoretical observations are included to complement the empirical analysis.
* Lack of novelty: Most of the work builds directly on top of Wu et al. and mirrors many parts of it. The architecture and setup are almost exactly the same, and even some claims, like the benefit of efficiency and interpretability, are taken straight from there. This is not to say that they are not true, but for example in the case of interpretability, there is not much evidence provided beyond the fact that the architecture is simpler. * The theoretical contribution in the paper feels somewh
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMobile Agent-Based Network Management · Network Packet Processing and Optimization · Network Traffic and Congestion Control
