Analysis of a Class of Stochastic Component-Wise Soft-Clipping Schemes
M{\aa}ns Williamson, Monika Eisenmann, Tony Stillfjord

TL;DR
This paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of a broad class of stochastic soft-clipping schemes, establishing convergence guarantees and rates, thereby supporting their reliable use in machine learning optimization tasks.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes a large class of stochastic soft-clipping schemes, providing convergence proofs and rates in both convex and non-convex settings.
Findings
Convergence in expectation under standard assumptions
Rates of convergence for convex and non-convex cases
Almost sure convergence to stationary points in non-convex scenarios
Abstract
Choosing the optimization algorithm that performs best on a given machine learning problem is often delicate, and there is no guarantee that current state-of-the-art algorithms will perform well across all tasks. Consequently, the more reliable methods that one has at hand, the larger the likelihood of a good end result. To this end, we introduce and analyze a large class of stochastic so-called soft-clipping schemes with a broad range of applications. Despite the wide adoption of clipping techniques in practice, soft-clipping methods have not been analyzed to a large extent in the literature. In particular, a rigorous mathematical analysis is lacking in the general, nonlinear case. Our analysis lays a theoretical foundation for a large class of such schemes, and motivates their usage. In particular, under standard assumptions such as Lipschitz continuous gradients of the objective…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2024
**Originality**: The authors present a novel class of stochastic optimizers that combine the idea of soft-clipping and element-wise gradient updates. **Quality**: The theoretical setting is well-posed and well-presented. Indeed, all assumptions are clearly stated, grounded in the literature, and are not restrictive. Together with their proof, the theoretical results are clearly stated and easy to follow and understand. **Clarity**: The key messages of the paper are clearly reported at the end
**Research Aspect:** While the topic is clearly of interest, I am left wondering about the effective novelty of the contribution. To be more specific, Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2 in Zhang et al. (2020a) already provide convergence results for a hard-clipping algorithm. Additionally, in _Appendix F Soft Clipping_ of the same paper, the authors give a fairly reasonable explanation of why such results should easily generalize to the _soft-clipping_ version of their algorithm. If I look at Theorem
1. The article gives proofs of convergence in expectation with rates in both the convex and the non-convex case. 2. The numerical experiments in this paper are beautiful which shows that soft-clipping algorithms may offer regularization benefits in cases where other algorithms tend to overfit, encouraging the use of soft-clipping algorithms and further research in the field.
1. The comparative analysis with other literatures is insufficient, and it is difficult to see the innovation of the convergence results or proofs in this paper. 2. This paper lacks some intuitive understanding and analysis of the theorems and corollaries given. Especially for the symbols $\w_k(w)$ without interpretation in Corollary 2, it’s hard for readers to understand and what insight the corollary hopes to provide.
### Originality The results given in the paper are, up to my knowledge, novel. The fact that the method and its proof work for a very general range of clipping schemes makes such proof useful to a larger extend in the literature. ### Quality Unless I am mistaken, overall the proofs look good and of quality. ### Clarity The previous works, context, and assumptions for the theorems, as well as the main results (in theory and practice) are clearly described. ### Significance I believe the pr
- 1. I think that the comparison with state of the arts results (theorems, assumptions), could be made a bit more explicit and structured (see question 1 below) - 2. I think that the reason why considering new special soft-clipping schemes could be elaborated on further (see question 2 below).
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
