A Discussion of Arnold's Limit Problem and its Geometric Argument
Keising Honn

TL;DR
This paper re-evaluates Arnold's limit problem, confirming the lemma's correctness with power series methods and identifying a flaw in the original geometric proof through a counterexample.
Contribution
It provides a new proof of Arnold's lemma using power series and highlights a defect in the original geometric argument.
Findings
Confirmed the correctness of Arnold's lemma using power series
Constructed a counterexample showing flaw in the original geometric proof
Clarified the geometric argument's limitations
Abstract
Upon re-examining Arnold's established lemma for explaining his famous limit problem, we have determined that while the lemma itself is correct, there is a defect in the original geometric proof. In this paper, we prove the correctness of the lemma using methods of power series, and construct a counterexample to illustrate the defect in Arnold's geometric proof.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
