Crossing the principle-practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving
Nicholas Kluge Corr\^ea, James William Santos, Camila Galv\~ao, and Marcelo Pasetti, Dieine Schiavon, Faizah Naqvi, Robayet Hossain, and Nythamar De Oliveira

TL;DR
This paper introduces Ethical Problem-Solving (EPS), a framework designed to bridge the gap between AI ethical principles and practical implementation, promoting responsible and human-centric AI development.
Contribution
The work presents a novel framework for translating AI ethics principles into actionable practices using impact assessments and differential recommendations.
Findings
Developed an EPS blueprint for ethical AI implementation
Created an Ethics as a Service Platform demonstration
Open-sourced all framework components for community adoption
Abstract
The past years have presented a surge in (AI) development, fueled by breakthroughs in deep learning, increased computational power, and substantial investments in the field. Given the generative capabilities of more recent AI systems, the era of large-scale AI models has transformed various domains that intersect our daily lives. However, this progress raises concerns about the balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, safety measures, and financial interests. Moreover, using such systems in sensitive areas amplifies our general ethical awareness, prompting a reemergence of debates on governance, regulation, and human values. However, amidst this landscape, how to bridge the principle-practice gap separating ethical discourse from the technical side of AI development remains an open problem. In response to this challenge, the present work proposes a framework to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
