The TikToking troll and weaponization of conscience: A systems perspective case study
Michelle Espinoza

TL;DR
This paper examines how cybercriminals, exemplified by a TikToker, manipulate conscience to influence populations, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary and systemic approaches to understanding and combating cybercrime.
Contribution
It provides a systems perspective case study on weaponization of conscience in cybercrime, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary cooperation and systemic analysis.
Findings
Weaponization of conscience can manipulate multiple actors.
Cybercrime often involves human error, especially phishing.
Understanding systemic interactions is crucial for cybersecurity.
Abstract
Cybercrime is a pervasive threat that impacts every facet of society. Its reach transcends geographic borders and extends far beyond the digital realm, often serving as the catalyst for offline crimes. As modern conflicts become increasingly intertwined with cyber warfare, the need for interdisciplinary cooperation to grasp and combat this escalating threat is paramount. This case study centers around a controversial TikToker, highlighting how the weaponization of conscience can be leveraged to manipulate multiple actors within a propagandist's target population. Weaponization of conscience is a tactic used by fraudsters to camouflage their activity, deceive their victims, and extend the effectiveness of their modi operandi. Research shows that 95 percent of cybersecurity incidents are the result of human error and 90 percent begin with a phishing attempt. Honing the capacity to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion
