GraLMatch: Matching Groups of Entities with Graphs and Language Models

TL;DR

This paper introduces GraLMatch, a graph-based method for entity group matching across multiple data sources, emphasizing the importance of transitive information and fine-tuning language models for improved accuracy.

Contribution

It presents a novel approach combining graph properties and Transformer fine-tuning to enhance multi-source entity group matching, along with new benchmark datasets.

Findings

Considering transitive matches improves group accuracy.

Graph-based filtering reduces false positives.

Fine-tuning DistilBERT enhances matching precision.

Abstract

In this paper, we present an end-to-end multi-source Entity Matching problem, which we call entity group matching, where the goal is to assign to the same group, records originating from multiple data sources but representing the same real-world entity. We focus on the effects of transitively matched records, i.e. the records connected by paths in the graph G = (V,E) whose nodes and edges represent the records and whether they are a match or not. We present a real-world instance of this problem, where the challenge is to match records of companies and financial securities originating from different data providers. We also introduce two new multi-source benchmark datasets that present similar matching challenges as real-world records. A distinctive characteristic of these records is that they are regularly updated following real-world events, but updates are not applied uniformly across data sources. This phenomenon makes the matching of certain groups of records only possible through the use of transitive information. In our experiments, we illustrate how considering transitively matched records is challenging since a limited amount of false positive pairwise match predictions can throw off the group assignment of large quantities of records. Thus, we propose GraLMatch, a method that can partially detect and remove false positive pairwise predictions through graph-based properties. Finally, we showcase how fine-tuning a Transformer-based model (DistilBERT) on a reduced number of labeled samples yields a better final entity group matching than training on more samples and/or incorporating fine-tuning optimizations, illustrating how precision becomes the deciding factor in the entity group matching of large volumes of records.