Can we say a cat is a cat? Understanding the challenges in annotating physiological signal-based emotion data
Pragya Singh, Mohan Kumar, Pushpendra Singh

TL;DR
This paper discusses the complexities and challenges of accurately annotating emotion data derived from physiological signals, emphasizing the need for nuanced methods to improve AI emotion recognition.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of current annotation techniques for physiological emotion data and advocates for more refined approaches to better capture emotional nuances.
Findings
Highlighting the limitations of current annotation methods
Emphasizing the importance of nuanced annotation processes
Calling for improved data collection techniques in real-world settings
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms, trained on emotion data extracted from physiological signals, provide a promising approach to monitoring emotions, affect, and mental well-being. However, the field encounters challenges because there is a lack of effective methods for collecting high-quality data in everyday settings that genuinely reflect changes in emotion or affect. This paper presents a position discussion on the current technique of annotating physiological signal-based emotion data. Our discourse underscores the importance of adopting a nuanced understanding of annotation processes, paving the way for a more insightful exploration of the intricate relationship between physiological signals and human emotions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmotion and Mood Recognition
