I don't trust you (anymore)! -- The effect of students' LLM use on Lecturer-Student-Trust in Higher Education
Simon Kloker, Matthew Bazanya, Twaha Kateete

TL;DR
This study investigates how students' use of Large Language Models affects trust and collaboration in higher education, emphasizing transparency and proposing guidelines to foster ethical use and maintain trust.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the importance of transparency in LLM use to sustain trust and offers policy recommendations for ethical integration in educational settings.
Findings
Transparency in LLM use positively influences team trust.
Lecturers prioritize transparency over fairness in LLM usage.
Guidelines supporting transparency can enhance collaborative learning.
Abstract
Trust plays a pivotal role in Lecturer-Student-Collaboration, encompassing teaching and research aspects. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) in platforms like Open AI's ChatGPT, coupled with their cost-effectiveness and high-quality results, has led to their rapid adoption among university students. However, discerning genuine student input from LLM-generated output poses a challenge for lecturers. This dilemma jeopardizes the trust relationship between lecturers and students, potentially impacting university downstream activities, particularly collaborative research initiatives. Despite attempts to establish guidelines for student LLM use, a clear framework mutually beneficial for lecturers and students in higher education remains elusive. This study addresses the research question: How does the use of LLMs by students impact Informational and Procedural Justice, influencing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
