TL;DR
This paper compares four lightweight, non-deep learning unsupervised online intrusion detection systems for detecting masquerade attacks in vehicular CAN networks, emphasizing real-time streaming conditions and practical applicability.
Contribution
It provides a comparative evaluation of four different non-DL-based IDS methods under realistic streaming conditions using the ROAD dataset.
Findings
The hierarchical clustering change detection method performs best.
None of the evaluated IDS detect all attack types.
The best method has higher computational overhead.
Abstract
Vehicular controller area networks (CANs) are susceptible to masquerade attacks by malicious adversaries. In masquerade attacks, adversaries silence a targeted ID and then send malicious frames with forged content at the expected timing of benign frames. As masquerade attacks could seriously harm vehicle functionality and are the stealthiest attacks to detect in CAN, recent work has devoted attention to compare frameworks for detecting masquerade attacks in CAN. However, most existing works report offline evaluations using CAN logs already collected using simulations that do not comply with the domain's real-time constraints. Here we contribute to advance the state of the art by presenting a comparative evaluation of four different non-deep learning (DL)-based unsupervised online intrusion detection systems (IDS) for masquerade attacks in CAN. Our approach differs from existing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSoftmax · Attention Is All You Need
