Investigating the Role of Explainability and AI Literacy in User Compliance
Niklas K\"uhl, Christian Meske, Maximilian Nitsche, Jodie Lobana

TL;DR
This study explores how explainability and AI literacy influence user compliance with AI recommendations, highlighting the mediating role of mental models in understanding and trust.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the effects of different types of XAI and AI literacy on user compliance, emphasizing the importance of mental models.
Findings
XAI increases user compliance
AI literacy positively influences compliance
Mental models mediate the relationship between XAI, literacy, and compliance
Abstract
AI is becoming increasingly common across different domains. However, as sophisticated AI-based systems are often black-boxed, rendering the decision-making logic opaque, users find it challenging to comply with their recommendations. Although researchers are investigating Explainable AI (XAI) to increase the transparency of the underlying machine learning models, it is unclear what types of explanations are effective and what other factors increase compliance. To better understand the interplay of these factors, we conducted an experiment with 562 participants who were presented with the recommendations of an AI and two different types of XAI. We find that users' compliance increases with the introduction of XAI but is also affected by AI literacy. We also find that the relationships between AI literacy XAI and users' compliance are mediated by the users' mental model of AI. Our study…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
