Can one condition a killed random walk to survive?
Lucas Rey, Augusto Teixeira

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether a killed random walk conditioned to survive can be well-defined, analyzing different killing probabilities and their impact on the walk's limiting behavior across various dimensions.
Contribution
It establishes conditions under which the conditioned killed random walk is well-defined, extending understanding of survival conditioning in different dimensions and for various killing functions.
Findings
Conditioning is well-defined for p(r) = o(r^{-2})
Conditioning is not well-defined for p(r) = min(1, r^{-eta}) with ta 14/9, 2
Results relate to the infinite snake in four dimensions
Abstract
We consider the simple random walk on killed with probability at site for a function decaying at infinity. Due to recurrence in dimension , the killed random walk (KRW) dies almost surely if is positive, while in dimension it is known that the KRW dies almost surely if and only if , under mild technical assumptions on . In this paper we consider, for any , functions for which the KRW dies almost surely and we ask ourselves if the KRW conditioned to survive is well-defined. More precisely, given an exhaustion of , does the KRW conditioned to leave before dying converges in distribution towards a limit which does not depend on the exhaustion? We first prove that this conditioning is well-defined for , and that it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
