Not as Simple as It Looked: Are We Concluding for Biased Arrest Practices?
Murat Ozer, Halil Akbas, Ismail Onat, Mehmet Bastug, Arif Akgul, Nelly, ElSayed, Zag ElSayed, Multu Koseli, Niyazi Ekici

TL;DR
This study critically examines racial disparities in violent arrests, highlighting the significant influence of neighborhood characteristics over racial bias, and calls for nuanced analysis and community-focused policies.
Contribution
It introduces alternative scenarios and emphasizes neighborhood factors, challenging simplistic interpretations of racial disparities in arrest data.
Findings
Approximately 40% of variation in arrests is due to neighborhood characteristics.
Neighborhood disadvantage neutralizes racial effects on arrest rates.
Complex factors beyond race influence arrest disparities.
Abstract
This study examines racial disparities in violent arrest outcomes, challenging conventional methods through a nuanced analysis of Cincinnati Police Department data. Acknowledging the intricate nature of racial disparity, the study categorizes explanations into types of place, types of person, and a combination of both, emphasizing the impact of neighborhood characteristics on crime distribution and police deployment. By introducing alternative scenarios, such as spuriousness, directed policing, and the geo-concentration of racial groups, the study underscores the complexity of racial disparity calculations. Employing a case study approach, the analysis of violent arrest outcomes reveals approximately 40 percent of the observed variation attributed to neighborhood-level characteristics, with concentrated disadvantage neutralizing the influence of race on arrest rates. Contrary to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCriminal Law and Evidence · Jury Decision Making Processes · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
