Simon's algorithm in the NISQ cloud
Reece Robertson, Emery Doucet, Ernest Spicer, Sebastian Deffner

TL;DR
This paper uses Simon's algorithm to benchmark current NISQ devices, providing an objective comparison of IBM and IonQ platforms and emphasizing the importance of device architecture in quantum algorithm implementation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel benchmarking approach using Simon's algorithm to evaluate real-world quantum hardware performance.
Findings
IBM and IonQ devices show differing error rates.
Device architecture significantly impacts algorithm performance.
Spatial separation of qubits affects two-qubit operation efficiency.
Abstract
Simon's algorithm was one of the first problems to demonstrate a genuine quantum advantage. The algorithm, however, assumes access to noise-free qubits. In our work we use Simon's algorithm to benchmark the error rates of devices currently available in the "quantum cloud." As a main result we obtain an objective comparison between the different physical platforms made available by IBM and IonQ. Our study highlights the importance of understanding the device architectures and chip topologies when transpiling quantum algorithms onto hardware. For instance, we demonstrate that two-qubit operations on spatially separated qubits on superconducting chips should be avoided.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Cognitive Computing and Networks · Advanced Database Systems and Queries
