On GNN explanability with activation rules

TL;DR

This paper introduces a method to interpret GNNs by mining activation rules in hidden layers, providing insights into their decision process and improving explanation fidelity significantly.

Contribution

It proposes a novel algorithm to enumerate activation rules covering all input graphs, enhancing GNN interpretability with an information-theoretic approach.

Findings

Rules provide insights into GNN features used for classification.

Method achieves up to 200% improvement in explanation fidelity.

Applicable to both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Abstract

GNNs are powerful models based on node representation learning that perform particularly well in many machine learning problems related to graphs. The major obstacle to the deployment of GNNs is mostly a problem of societal acceptability and trustworthiness, properties which require making explicit the internal functioning of such models. Here, we propose to mine activation rules in the hidden layers to understand how the GNNs perceive the world. The problem is not to discover activation rules that are individually highly discriminating for an output of the model. Instead, the challenge is to provide a small set of rules that cover all input graphs. To this end, we introduce the subjective activation pattern domain. We define an effective and principled algorithm to enumerate activations rules in each hidden layer. The proposed approach for quantifying the interest of these rules is rooted in information theory and is able to account for background knowledge on the input graph data. The activation rules can then be redescribed thanks to pattern languages involving interpretable features. We show that the activation rules provide insights on the characteristics used by the GNN to classify the graphs. Especially, this allows to identify the hidden features built by the GNN through its different layers. Also, these rules can subsequently be used for explaining GNN decisions. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance, with up to 200% improvement in fidelity on explaining graph classification over the SOTA methods.