Parameter effects on the total intensity of H I Ly{\alpha} line for a modelled coronal mass ejection and its driven shock

TL;DR

This study uses 3D MHD simulations to analyze how assumptions about disk Ly{eta} emission, scattering geometry, and temperature influence the theoretical Ly{eta} intensities in CMEs and shocks, improving diagnostic accuracy.

Contribution

It systematically evaluates the effects of key assumptions on Ly{eta} intensity calculations in modeled CMEs and shocks, providing guidance for more precise diagnostics.

Findings

Uniform or Carrington maps underestimate Ly{eta} intensity by less than 10%.

Scattering geometry has a minor impact, with uncertainties below 5%.

Temperature assumptions can cause over 50% uncertainty in CME core intensity.

Abstract

The combination of the H I Ly{\alpha} (121.6 nm) line formation mechanism with ultraviolet (UV) Ly{\alpha} and white-light (WL) observations provides an effective method for determining the electron temperature of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). A key to ensuring the accuracy of this diagnostic technique is the precise calculation of theoretical Ly{\alpha} intensities. This study performs a modelled CME and its driven shock via the 3D MHD simulation. We generate synthetic UV and WL images of the CME and shock to quantify the impact of different assumptions on theoretical Ly{\alpha} intensities, such as the incident intensity of the Ly{\alpha} line (Idisk), the geometric scattering function (p({\theta})), and the kinetic temperature (Tn) assumed to be equal to the proton (Tp) or electron (Te) temperatures. By comparing differences of the Ly{\alpha} intensities under these assumptions, we find that: (1) Using the uniform or Carrington maps of the disk Ly{\alpha} emission underestimates the corona Ly{\alpha} intensity (< 10%) compared to the synchronic map, except for a slight overestimate (< 4%) in the partial CME core. The Carrington map yields lower uncertainties than the uniform disk. (2) The geometric scattering process has a minor impact on the Ly{\alpha} intensity, with a maximum relative uncertainty of < 5%. The Ly{\alpha} intensity is underestimated for the most part but overestimated in the CME core. (3) Compared to the assumption Tn = Tp, using Tn = Te leads to more complex relative uncertainties in CME Ly{\alpha} intensity. The CME core and void are both overestimated, with the maximum uncertainty in the core exceeding 50% and the void remaining below 35%. In the CME front, both over- and under-estimates exist with relative uncertainties of < 35%. The electron temperature assumption has a smaller impact on the shock, with an underestimated relative uncertainty of less than 20%.