Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Metrology
Tameem Adel, Sam Bilson, Mark Levene, Andrew Thompson

TL;DR
This paper reviews research on trustworthy AI in metrology, emphasizing uncertainty quantification and certification to ensure reliable and responsible AI systems in measurement science.
Contribution
It introduces three themes of trustworthy AI in metrology and discusses NPL's research on uncertainty quantification and AI certification methods.
Findings
Uncertainty quantification enhances transparency in AI outputs.
Three themes of TAI: technical, socio-technical, social.
Certification processes are key for trustworthy AI in metrology.
Abstract
We review research at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in the area of trustworthy artificial intelligence (TAI), and more specifically trustworthy machine learning (TML), in the context of metrology, the science of measurement. We describe three broad themes of TAI: technical, socio-technical and social, which play key roles in ensuring that the developed models are trustworthy and can be relied upon to make responsible decisions. From a metrology perspective we emphasise uncertainty quantification (UQ), and its importance within the framework of TAI to enhance transparency and trust in the outputs of AI systems. We then discuss three research areas within TAI that we are working on at NPL, and examine the certification of AI systems in terms of adherence to the characteristics of TAI.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Big Data and Business Intelligence
