Note on a Theoretical Justification for Approximations of Arithmetic Forwards
\'Alvaro Romaniega

TL;DR
This paper provides a theoretical foundation for approximating arithmetic forwards using weighted averages of overnight forwards, introduces computationally efficient methods, and explores bounds and formulas within Gaussian HJM models.
Contribution
It offers a new theoretical justification for arithmetic forward approximations, introduces stable model-dependent factors, and connects these to existing valuation methods.
Findings
Explicit model-dependent factors are stable and close to one under certain scenarios.
Proposed approximations are computationally cheaper and theoretically justified.
Connections to Takada's approximation for Fed Funds rate valuations.
Abstract
This note explores the theoretical justification for some approximations of arithmetic forwards () with weighted averages of overnight (ON) forwards (). The central equation presented in this analysis is: \begin{equation*} F_a(0;T_s,T_e)=\frac{1}{\tau(T_s,T_e)}\sum_{k=1}^K \tau_k \mathcal{A}_k F_k\,, \end{equation*} with being explicit model-dependent quantities, numerically stable and close to one under certain market scenarios. We will present computationally cheaper methods that approximate , i.e., we will define some such that \begin{equation*} F_a(0;T_s,T_e)\approx \frac{1}{\tau(T_s,T_e)}\sum_{k=1}^K \tau_k \tilde{\mathcal{A}}_k F_k\,, \end{equation*} thereby gaining some intuition about the arithmetic factors . Additionally, theoretical bounds and closed-form expressions for the arithmetic factors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical Methods and Algorithms
