Different Planetary Eccentricity-Period (PEP) Distributions of Small- and Giant-Planets
Dolev Bashi, Tsevi Mazeh, Simchon Faigler

TL;DR
This study analyzes the eccentricity-period distributions of small and giant exoplanets, revealing distinct patterns likely caused by different tidal and dynamical processes, with implications for planetary formation and evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of PEP distributions for small and giant exoplanets, highlighting the role of tidal circularization and dynamical interactions.
Findings
Giant planets show an increasing eccentricity with period, reaching 0.8 at 100 days.
Small planets exhibit a flat eccentricity distribution between 0.1 and 0.5.
The observed distributions are not due to detection biases.
Abstract
We used the database of short-period ( days) exoplanets radial-velocity (RV) orbits to study the planetary eccentricity-period (PEP) distribution. We first divided the sample into low- and high-mass exoplanet sub-samples based on the distribution of the (minimum) planetary masses, which displays a clear two-Gaussian distribution, separated at . We then selected orbits, low- and high-mass alike, with eccentricities significantly distinct from circular orbits. The giant-planet eccentric orbits display a clear upper envelope, which we model quantitatively, rises monotonically from zero eccentricity and reaches an eccentricity of at days. Conversely, the low-mass planetary orbits display a flat eccentricity distribution between and , with almost no dependence on the orbital period. We show that the striking…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Space Exploration and Technology · Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
