What is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Health
Jianhui Gao, Benson Chou, Zachary R. McCaw, Hilary Thurston, Paul Varghese, Chuan Hong, Jessica Gronsbell

TL;DR
This paper explores how fairness is defined and measured in machine learning for healthcare, addressing challenges and opportunities for equitable clinical decision-making.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of fairness concepts, measurement approaches, and future research directions in ML for health.
Findings
Fairness notions include group, individual, and causal frameworks.
Challenges in operationalizing fairness in healthcare applications.
Opportunities for improving equitable ML models in health.
Abstract
Ensuring that machine learning (ML) models are safe, effective, and equitable across all patients is critical for clinical decision-making and for preventing the amplification of existing health disparities. In this work, we examine how fairness is conceptualized in ML for health, including why ML models may lead to unfair decisions and how fairness has been measured in diverse real-world applications. We review commonly used fairness notions within group, individual, and causal-based frameworks. We also discuss the outlook for future research and highlight opportunities and challenges in operationalizing fairness in health-focused applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
