TL;DR
This study links exposure to antivaccine tweets with reduced COVID-19 vaccination rates and increased cases and deaths in the US, providing evidence of online speech impacting real-world health outcomes.
Contribution
It introduces a novel methodology to causally connect online antivaccine content with offline vaccination behavior and epidemic outcomes.
Findings
Exposure to antivaccine tweets caused approximately 14,000 vaccine refusals.
Reduced vaccination led to at least 545 additional COVID-19 cases.
At least 8 more deaths were associated with antivaccine content exposure.
Abstract
Despite the wide availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States and their effectiveness in reducing hospitalizations and mortality during the pandemic, a majority of Americans chose not to be vaccinated during 2021. Recent work shows that vaccine misinformation affects intentions in controlled settings, but does not link it to real-world vaccination rates. Here, we present observational evidence of a causal relationship between exposure to antivaccine content and vaccination rates, and estimate the size of this effect. We present a compartmental epidemic model that includes vaccination, vaccine hesitancy, and exposure to antivaccine content. We fit the model to data to determine that a geographical pattern of exposure to online antivaccine content across US counties explains reduced vaccine uptake in the same counties. We find observational evidence that exposure to antivaccine…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
