TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark evaluating 17 graph pooling methods across 28 datasets, focusing on effectiveness, robustness, and generalizability in various graph learning tasks.
Contribution
It introduces a standardized benchmark with extensive experiments, including robustness and efficiency analyses, to fairly compare graph pooling approaches.
Findings
Graph pooling methods show varying effectiveness across tasks.
Robustness analysis reveals vulnerability to noise attacks.
Benchmark provides valuable insights for future graph pooling research.
Abstract
Graph pooling has gained attention for its ability to obtain effective node and graph representations for various downstream tasks. Despite the recent surge in graph pooling approaches, there is a lack of standardized experimental settings and fair benchmarks to evaluate their performance. To address this issue, we have constructed a comprehensive benchmark that includes 17 graph pooling methods and 28 different graph datasets. This benchmark systematically assesses the performance of graph pooling methods in three dimensions, i.e., effectiveness, robustness, and generalizability. We first evaluate the performance of these graph pooling approaches across different tasks including graph classification, graph regression and node classification. Then, we investigate their performance under potential noise attacks and out-of-distribution shifts in real-world scenarios. We also involve…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
