An AI Architecture with the Capability to Explain Recognition Results
Paul Whitten, Francis Wolff, Chris Papachristou

TL;DR
This paper introduces new metrics and methods to improve the explainability of machine learning models, achieving better performance while providing plain-language explanations of decisions.
Contribution
It proposes two novel methods combining explainable and unexplainable flows, and introduces a new metric that enhances explainability and effectiveness of neural networks.
Findings
New explainability metrics outperform existing ones.
Methods improve neural network interpretability.
Examples demonstrate practical effectiveness on handwritten datasets.
Abstract
Explainability is needed to establish confidence in machine learning results. Some explainable methods take a post hoc approach to explain the weights of machine learning models, others highlight areas of the input contributing to decisions. These methods do not adequately explain decisions, in plain terms. Explainable property-based systems have been shown to provide explanations in plain terms, however, they have not performed as well as leading unexplainable machine learning methods. This research focuses on the importance of metrics to explainability and contributes two methods yielding performance gains. The first method introduces a combination of explainable and unexplainable flows, proposing a metric to characterize explainability of a decision. The second method compares classic metrics for estimating the effectiveness of neural networks in the system, posing a new metric as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsHigh-Order Consensuses
