The verification of periodicity with the use of recurrent neural networks
Niall Miller, Philip Lucas, Yi Sun, Zhen Guo, Calum Morris, William, Cooper

TL;DR
This paper introduces a machine learning method using recurrent neural networks to automatically verify the periodicity in astronomical time-series data, overcoming limitations of traditional analytic approaches.
Contribution
It presents a novel RNN-based technique that directly analyzes phase-folded light curves for false alarm probability, independent of light curve shape.
Findings
Method is insensitive to light curve shape
Establishes minimum data points for reliable verification
Effective in large astronomical survey data
Abstract
The ability to automatically and robustly self-verify periodicity present in time-series astronomical data is becoming more important as data sets rapidly increase in size. The age of large astronomical surveys has rendered manual inspection of time-series data less practical. Previous efforts in generating a false alarm probability to verify the periodicity of stars have been aimed towards the analysis of a constructed periodogram. However, these methods feature correlations with features that do not pertain to periodicity, such as light curve shape, slow trends and stochastic variability. The common assumption that photometric errors are Gaussian and well determined is also a limitation of analytic methods. We present a novel machine learning based technique which directly analyses the phase folded light curve for its false alarm probability. We show that the results of this method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy Logic and Control Systems · Neural Networks and Applications · Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
