A Brief Note on a Recent Claim About NP-Hard Problems and BQP
Michael C. Chavrimootoo

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent claim that NP-hard problems are not in BQP, highlighting issues in the original argument and concluding it does not prove what was claimed.
Contribution
It clarifies errors in Czerwinski's paper and argues that the claim about NP-hard problems not being in BQP is unsubstantiated.
Findings
Identifies major and minor issues in Czerwinski's argument
Concludes the claim about NP-hard problems in BQP is unproven
Highlights the importance of rigorous proof in quantum complexity
Abstract
This short note outlines some of the issues in Czerwinski's paper [Cze23] claiming that NP-hard problems are not in BQP. We outline one major issue and two minor issues, and conclude that their paper does not establish what they claim it does.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Packing Problems · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
