Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan, Feuerriegel, Torbj{\o}rn Netland

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that providing explainable AI support, such as visual heatmaps, significantly enhances human task performance in real-world domains like manufacturing and medicine, compared to black-box AI.
Contribution
It is the first large-scale empirical evidence showing that explainable AI improves human decision accuracy in practical, high-stakes tasks.
Findings
Explainable AI reduces median error rates five-fold in manufacturing tasks.
Participants perform better with explainable AI than with black-box AI.
Explainable AI helps humans validate and overrule AI predictions effectively.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
