An Industry Interview Study of Software Signing for Supply Chain Security
Kelechi G. Kalu, Tanya Singla, Chinenye Okafor, Santiago Torres-Arias,, James C. Davis

TL;DR
This study explores industry perspectives on software signing practices, challenges, and impacts in supply chain security through interviews with security practitioners, revealing diverse challenges and attitudes affecting adoption.
Contribution
It provides an in-depth qualitative analysis of real-world challenges and perceptions related to software signing in industry, which was previously lacking.
Findings
Practitioners highlight technical, organizational, and human challenges.
Experts disagree on the importance of software signing.
Internal and external events influence signing adoption.
Abstract
Many software products are composed of components integrated from other teams or external parties. Each additional link in a software product's supply chain increases the risk of the injection of malicious behavior. To improve supply chain provenance, many cybersecurity frameworks, standards, and regulations recommend the use of software signing. However, recent surveys and measurement studies have found that the adoption rate and quality of software signatures are low. We lack in-depth industry perspectives on the challenges and practices of software signing. To understand software signing in practice, we interviewed 18 experienced security practitioners across 13 organizations. We study the challenges that affect the effective implementation of software signing in practice. We also provide possible impacts of experienced software supply chain failures, security standards, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation and Cyber Security
