Efficient Neural Common Neighbor for Temporal Graph Link Prediction
Xiaohui Zhang, Yanbo Wang, Xiyuan Wang, Muhan Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces TNCN, an efficient neural model for temporal graph link prediction that balances expressive pairwise modeling with high computational efficiency, outperforming existing methods on large-scale datasets.
Contribution
We propose TNCN, a novel temporal neural model that efficiently captures pairwise neighbor information for link prediction in large temporal graphs, achieving state-of-the-art results.
Findings
TNCN achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple large-scale datasets.
TNCN outperforms GNN baselines by up to 30.3 times in speed.
TNCN effectively balances expressive power and computational efficiency.
Abstract
Temporal graphs are widespread in real-world applications such as social networks, as well as trade and transportation networks. Predicting dynamic links within these evolving graphs is a key problem. Many memory-based methods use temporal interaction histories to generate node embeddings, which are then combined to predict links. However, these approaches primarily focus on individual node representations, often overlooking the inherently pairwise nature of link prediction. While some recent methods attempt to capture pairwise features, they tend to be limited by high computational complexity arising from repeated embedding calculations, making them unsuitable for large-scale datasets like the Temporal Graph Benchmark (TGB). To address the critical need for models that combine strong expressive power with high computational efficiency for link prediction on large temporal graphs, we…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
1. The experiments is substantial and the result is good. Comparing with 9 baseline models, TNCN performs best on three of the five selected datasets, which emphasizes its effectiveness. 2. The method section is clearly described using formulas. With clear definition and detailed formulas, the method is well-presented. 3. There are proofs on the theorems in appendix, which improves the professionalism of the paper.
1. Since the process is relatively complicated, it is recommended to provide a pseudo code to make it easier for readers to understand. 2. I suggest that the experimental part be supplemented with an analysis of the hyperparameters, which can make the values of the hyperparameters more reasonable.
- **Evaluation**: The proposed model is evaluated on established benchmarks, enhancing the reliability of the results. - **Engineering**: The paper introduces an engineering approach to combine common neighbor (CN) techniques with memory-based methods, integrating these two modeling approaches.
**Presentation**: The abstract implies that common neighbor methods are primarily used in static graphs, overlooking their established role in dynamic graph modeling. Additionally, the motivation for combining memory-based and neighbor-based techniques is presented only briefly at the end of the introduction. **Limited Novelty**: The proposed model's core components primarily consist of established techniques. For instance, the memory-based module closely resembles TGN, lacking additional innov
This paper has several strengths worth noting: * **Interesting Motivation.** The motivation for extracting common neighbor features is compelling. * **Extensive Experiments.** The author has designed a variety of experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of their methods. * **Well-Organized Representation.** The paper is well-structured, and the theoretical analysis provides strong support for the proposed methods.
However, the paper also has some weaknesses, outlined as follows: * **Lack of Novelty.** Firstly, the idea of extracting common neighbors in temporal graphs has certainly been explored before. It seems that the design of your key component, the "CN Extractor," closely resembles existing work in KDD2024 [1]. Moreover, your CN extracting component does not appear to include any specific improvements for temporal graphs. Simply extracting "monotone k-hop events" does not substantiate this claim. *
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Graph Theory and Algorithms
MethodsFocus
