Individual Packet Features are a Risk to Model Generalisation in ML-Based Intrusion Detection
Kahraman Kostas, Mike Just, Michael A. Lones

TL;DR
This paper investigates how relying solely on individual packet features in ML-based intrusion detection can lead to overestimated detection performance and poor generalization across datasets, highlighting the need for considering packet interactions.
Contribution
It reveals the limitations of individual packet features and emphasizes the importance of incorporating packet interactions for more robust and generalizable intrusion detection models.
Findings
IPF can produce misleadingly high detection rates
Models based on IPF often fail to generalize across datasets
Packet interactions are crucial for robust intrusion detection
Abstract
Machine learning is increasingly used for intrusion detection in IoT networks. This paper explores the effectiveness of using individual packet features (IPF), which are attributes extracted from a single network packet, such as timing, size, and source-destination information. Through literature review and experiments, we identify the limitations of IPF, showing they can produce misleadingly high detection rates. Our findings emphasize the need for approaches that consider packet interactions for robust intrusion detection. Additionally, we demonstrate that models based on IPF often fail to generalize across datasets, compromising their reliability in diverse IoT environments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
