How big is a tiling's return module?
Abigail Perryman, Lorenzo Sadun

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between the rank of a tiling's return module and its first Čech cohomology, establishing bounds and conditions under which they are equal, based on tile geometry and patch size.
Contribution
It demonstrates that for generic tile shapes and large patches, the return module's rank equals the first Čech cohomology's rank, linking geometric and topological properties.
Findings
The return module's rank depends on tile geometry, not topology.
For large patches, the return module's rank is bounded above by cohomology rank.
In generic cases, the return module's rank equals the cohomology rank.
Abstract
The rank of a tiling's return module depends on the geometry of its tiles and is not a topological invariant. However, the rank of the first \v Cech cohomology gives upper and lower bounds for the size of the return module. For all sufficiently large patches, the rank of the return module is at most the same as the rank of the cohomology. For a generic choice of tile shapes and an arbitrary reference patch, the rank of the return module is at least the rank of . Therefore, for generic tile shapes and sufficiently large patches, the rank of the return module is equal to the rank of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhase-change materials and chalcogenides · Photonic and Optical Devices · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
