The end of multiple choice tests: using AI to enhance assessment
Michael Klymkowsky, Melanie M. Cooper

TL;DR
This paper proposes replacing traditional multiple choice tests with AI-analyzed open-ended explanations to better understand student thinking and improve learning outcomes.
Contribution
It introduces a novel AI-based method to analyze student explanations, overcoming limitations of multiple choice assessments.
Findings
AI analysis provides rapid, detailed insights into student misconceptions
The approach offers actionable feedback to guide instruction
Preliminary results show improved understanding of student thinking
Abstract
Effective teaching relies on knowing what students know-or think they know. Revealing student thinking is challenging. Often used because of their ease of grading, even the best multiple choice (MC) tests, those using research based distractors (wrong answers) are intrinsically limited in the insights they provide due to two factors. When distractors do not reflect student beliefs they can be ignored, increasing the likelihood that the correct answer will be chosen by chance. Moreover, making the correct choice does not guarantee that the student understands why it is correct. To address these limitations, we recommend asking students to explain why they chose their answer, and why "wrong" choices are wrong. Using a discipline-trained artificial intelligence-based bot it is possible to analyze their explanations, identifying the concepts and scientific principles that maybe missing or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare · Online Learning and Analytics · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
