Quantifying Local Model Validity using Active Learning
Sven L\"ammle, Can Bogoclu, Robert Vo{\ss}hall, Anselm Haselhoff, Dirk, Roos

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to estimate local model validity using active learning, enabling efficient and sensitive validation of machine learning models in regulated applications.
Contribution
It proposes learning a model error for local validity estimation with active learning, reducing data needs and improving sensitivity over existing methods.
Findings
Error model achieves good discrimination with limited data
Method demonstrates increased sensitivity to local validity changes
Empirical results validate effectiveness on validation benchmarks
Abstract
Real-world applications of machine learning models are often subject to legal or policy-based regulations. Some of these regulations require ensuring the validity of the model, i.e., the approximation error being smaller than a threshold. A global metric is generally too insensitive to determine the validity of a specific prediction, whereas evaluating local validity is costly since it requires gathering additional data.We propose learning the model error to acquire a local validity estimate while reducing the amount of required data through active learning. Using model validation benchmarks, we provide empirical evidence that the proposed method can lead to an error model with sufficient discriminative properties using a relatively small amount of data. Furthermore, an increased sensitivity to local changes of the validity bounds compared to alternative approaches is demonstrated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Advanced Data Processing Techniques
