On eventually greedy best underapproximations by Egyptian fractions
Vjekoslav Kova\v{c}

TL;DR
This paper proves that for almost all positive real numbers, the greedy method does not produce the best Egyptian fraction underapproximations as the number of terms increases, resolving a problem posed by Erdős and Graham.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the set of numbers for which greedy Egyptian fraction underapproximations are optimal has Lebesgue measure zero, disproving a conjecture by Erdős and Graham.
Findings
The set of real numbers with eventually greedy best Egyptian underapproximations has measure zero.
The result applies to almost all positive real numbers, except a measure-zero set.
The paper resolves Problem 206 from Bloom's website.
Abstract
Erd\H{o}s and Graham found it conceivable that the best -term Egyptian underapproximation of almost every positive number for sufficiently large gets constructed in a greedy manner, i.e., from the best -term Egyptian underapproximation. We show that the opposite is true: the set of real numbers with this property has Lebesgue measure zero. [This note solves Problem 206 on Bloom's website "Erd\H{o}s problems".]
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical functions and polynomials · Mathematical Approximation and Integration · Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces
