Pseudo-Entanglement is Necessary for EFI Pairs
Manuel Goul\~ao, David Elkouss

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that EFI pairs imply the existence of pseudo-entanglement, establishing pseudo-entanglement as a minimal quantum resource necessary for foundational cryptographic primitives.
Contribution
It proves that EFI pairs imply pseudo-entanglement, positioning pseudo-entanglement as a new minimal assumption for cryptography based on quantum resources.
Findings
EFI pairs imply pseudo-entanglement
Pseudo-entanglement is necessary for key cryptographic primitives
Establishes a link between physical quantum phenomena and cryptography
Abstract
Regarding minimal assumptions, most of classical cryptography is known to depend on the existence of One-Way Functions (OWFs). However, recent evidence has shown that this is not the case when considering quantum resources. Besides the well known unconditional security of Quantum Key Distribution, it is now known that computational cryptography may be built on weaker primitives than OWFs, e.g., pseudo-random states [JLS18], one-way state generators [MY23], or EFI pairs of states [BCQ23]. We consider a new quantum resource, pseudo-entanglement, and show that the existence of EFI pairs, one of the current main candidates for the weakest computational assumption for cryptography (necessary for commitments, oblivious transfer, secure multi-party computation, computational zero-knowledge proofs), implies the existence of pseudo-entanglement, as defined by [ABF+24, ABV23] under some…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMagnetic Properties and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
