Dynamic Treatment Effects under Functional Longitudinal Studies
Andrew Ying

TL;DR
This paper develops a novel causal inference framework for functional longitudinal data with dynamic treatment regimes, addressing confounding biases in complex, real-time healthcare monitoring scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a nonparametric, population-level causal inference framework for FLD with DTRs, including identification, estimation formulas, and efficiency analysis.
Findings
Framework successfully identifies causal effects in simulations.
Derived formulas accommodate complex longitudinal treatment data.
Potential for application in real-time healthcare monitoring.
Abstract
Establishing causality is a fundamental goal in fields like medicine and social sciences. While randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for causal inference, they are not always feasible or ethical. Observational studies can serve as alternatives but introduce confounding biases, particularly in complex longitudinal data, where treatment-confounder feedback complicates analysis. The challenge increases with Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs), where treatment allocation depends on rich historical patient data. The advent of real-time healthcare monitoring technologies, such as MIMIC-IV and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), has popularized Functional Longitudinal Data (FLD). However, there is yet no investigate of causal inference for FLD with DTRs. In this paper, we address it by developing a population-level framework for functional longitudinal data, accommodating DTRs. To…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
