SecureNet: A Comparative Study of DeBERTa and Large Language Models for Phishing Detection

TL;DR

This study compares DeBERTa V3 and large language models like GPT-4 in phishing detection, evaluating their performance, limitations, and ability to generate convincing phishing content across diverse datasets.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of DeBERTa V3 and LLMs for phishing detection, highlighting their strengths, challenges, and practical effectiveness in cybersecurity applications.

Findings

DeBERTa V3 achieved 95.17% recall on phishing detection.

GPT-4 achieved 91.04% recall in the same task.

Transformer-based DeBERTa outperformed LLMs in detection accuracy.

Abstract

Phishing, whether through email, SMS, or malicious websites, poses a major threat to organizations by using social engineering to trick users into revealing sensitive information. It not only compromises company's data security but also incurs significant financial losses. In this paper, we investigate whether the remarkable performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) can be leveraged for particular task like text classification, particularly detecting malicious content and compare its results with state-of-the-art Deberta V3 (DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing) model. We systematically assess the potential and limitations of both approaches using comprehensive public datasets comprising diverse data sources such as email, HTML, URL, SMS, and synthetic data generation. Additionally, we demonstrate how LLMs can generate convincing phishing emails, making it harder to spot scams and evaluate the performance of both models in this context. Our study delves further into the challenges encountered by DeBERTa V3 during its training phases, fine-tuning methodology and transfer learning processes. Similarly, we examine the challenges associated with LLMs and assess their respective performance. Among our experimental approaches, the transformer-based DeBERTa method emerged as the most effective, achieving a test dataset (HuggingFace phishing dataset) recall (sensitivity) of 95.17% closely followed by GPT-4 providing a recall of 91.04%. We performed additional experiments with other datasets on the trained DeBERTa V3 model and LLMs like GPT 4 and Gemini 1.5. Based on our findings, we provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and robustness of these advanced language models, offering a detailed comparative analysis that can inform future research efforts in strengthening cybersecurity measures for detecting and mitigating phishing threats.