Review of Computational Epigraphy
Vishal Kumar

TL;DR
This paper surveys computational methods that improve the extraction, interpretation, and attribution of stone inscriptions in epigraphy, offering more efficient and less damaging alternatives to traditional techniques.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of existing computational approaches in epigraphy, highlighting advancements and potential for automation in text extraction and analysis.
Findings
Computational methods can automate text extraction from inscriptions.
Modern techniques reduce damage compared to manual methods.
Approaches enhance objectivity in interpretation and attribution.
Abstract
Computational Epigraphy refers to the process of extracting text from stone inscription, transliteration, interpretation, and attribution with the aid of computational methods. Traditional epigraphy methods are time consuming, and tend to damage the stone inscriptions while extracting text. Additionally, interpretation and attribution are subjective and can vary between different epigraphers. However, using modern computation methods can not only be used to extract text, but also interpret and attribute the text in a robust way. We survey and document the existing computational methods that aid in the above-mentioned tasks in epigraphy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
