Fisher's Mirage: Noise Tightening of Cosmological Constraints in Simulation-Based Inference
Christopher Wilson, Rachel bean

TL;DR
This paper investigates how statistical noise in numerical derivatives affects Fisher forecasts in large-scale structure surveys, revealing that noise can bias constraints and proposing methods to recover true limits.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of noise effects on Fisher forecasts and offers techniques to correct for noise bias in simulation-based inference.
Findings
Noisy derivatives can bias Fisher constraints, making them artificially tighter.
Higher-order differentiation schemes are more susceptible to noise effects.
Methods to recover true noise-free constraints from noisy Fisher forecasts.
Abstract
We systematically analyze the implications of statistical noise within numerical derivatives on simulation-based Fisher forecasts for large scale structure surveys. Noisy numerical derivatives resulting from a finite number of simulations, , act to bias the associated Fisher forecast such that the resulting marginalized constraints can be significantly tighter than the noise-free limit. We show the source of this effect can be traced to the influence of the noise on the marginalization process. Parameters such as the neutrino mass, , for which higher-order forward differentiation schemes are commonly used, are more prone to noise; the predicted constraints can be akin to those purely from a random instance of statistical noise even using simulations with realizations. We demonstrate how derivative noise can artificially reduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSimulation Techniques and Applications
