Impossibility of decoding a translation invariant measure from a single set of positive Lebesgue measure
Aleksandar Bulj

TL;DR
This paper constructs a counterexample showing that a translation invariant measure cannot be uniquely determined from a single set of positive Lebesgue measure, challenging assumptions about measure uniqueness.
Contribution
It provides a novel example of a translation invariant measure with a rich domain and range that is not Hausdorff, answering a longstanding open question.
Findings
Counterexample disproves measure uniqueness from a single set
Constructs a translation invariant measure with non-Hausdorff properties
Highlights limitations of measure determination from positive measure sets
Abstract
Let be a translation invariant measure on and let denote the Lebesgue measure on . If there exists an open set such that , it is a simple exercise to show that . Is the same conclusion true if is merely a Borel set? The main purpose of this short note is to construct a measure that provides a negative answer to this question. Incidentally, this construction provides a new example of a translation invariant measure with a rich domain and range that is not Hausdorff, a problem previously studied by Hirst.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference
