Some facts about the optimality of the LSE in the Gaussian sequence model with convex constraint
Akshay Prasadan, Matey Neykov

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which the least squares estimator (LSE) is minimax optimal in a convex constrained Gaussian sequence model, linking optimality to the local Gaussian width's properties and providing theoretical algorithms for risk assessment.
Contribution
It characterizes the necessary and sufficient conditions for LSE optimality in convex constrained Gaussian models, connecting it to the Lipschitz property of local Gaussian widths and analyzing various set examples.
Findings
LSE is minimax optimal when local Gaussian width mapping is Lipschitz.
Optimality depends on geometric properties of the constraint set.
Algorithms can estimate worst-case risk for different convex sets.
Abstract
We consider a convex constrained Gaussian sequence model and characterize necessary and sufficient conditions for the least squares estimator (LSE) to be minimax optimal. For a closed convex set we observe for and and aim to estimate . We characterize the worst case risk of the LSE in multiple ways by analyzing the behavior of the local Gaussian width on . We demonstrate that optimality is equivalent to a Lipschitz property of the local Gaussian width mapping. We also provide theoretical algorithms that search for the worst case risk. We then provide examples showing optimality or suboptimality of the LSE on various sets, including balls for , pyramids, solids of revolution, and multivariate isotonic regression, among others.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy Systems and Optimization · Fixed Point Theorems Analysis · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models
