TAR reconfiguration for vertex set parameters
Bryan A. Curtis, Mary Flagg, Leslie Hogben

TL;DR
This paper surveys and extends results on token addition and removal reconfiguration graphs for various vertex set parameters, including domination, zero forcing, and independence, highlighting new applications to maximizing parameters and graph connectedness.
Contribution
It broadens the scope of TAR reconfiguration results to include $Y$-sets and maximization parameters, and explores the necessary axioms for these results.
Findings
Main results apply to skew zero forcing and vertex covering.
TAR reconfiguration graphs for these parameters are characterized.
Connectedness in reconfiguration graphs extends to $X$-set and $Y$-set parameters.
Abstract
This paper surveys results about token addition and removal (TAR) reconfiguration for several well-known vertex set parameters including domination, power domination, standard zero forcing, and PSD zero forcing. We also expand the range of parameters to which universal -set TAR graph results apply, for -sets and their TAR graphs introduced in [B. Bjorkman, C. Bozeman, D. Ferrero, M. Flagg, C. Grood, L. Hogben, B. Jacob, C. Reinhart, Power domination reconfiguration, arXiv:2201.01798] and [N.H. Bong, J. Carlson, B. Curtis, R. Haas, L. Hogben, Isomorphisms and properties of TAR reconfiguration graphs for zero forcing and other -set parameters, \emph{Graphs Combin.} {39} (2023), Paper No. 86]. Here we examine which of the -set axioms are needed for which results. The main results apply to skew zero forcing and vertex covering, and results about TAR reconfiguration graphs of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsManufacturing Process and Optimization
