Classification of Fermi Gamma-Ray Bursts Based on Machine Learning
Si-Yuan Zhu, Wan-Peng Sun, Da-Ling Ma, Fu-Wen Zhang

TL;DR
This study uses unsupervised machine learning algorithms t-SNE and UMAP to classify Fermi gamma-ray bursts into two distinct clusters, revealing correlations with supernovae and kilonovae associations beyond traditional duration-based classification.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel application of t-SNE and UMAP for classifying GRBs, providing a more nuanced clustering that correlates with astrophysical phenomena.
Findings
GRBs are clearly divided into two clusters with t-SNE and UMAP.
All supernova-associated GRBs are in the second cluster.
Most kilonova-associated GRBs fall into the first cluster.
Abstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are typically classified into long and short GRBs based on their durations. However, there is a significant overlapping in the duration distributions of these two categories. In this paper, we apply the unsupervised dimensionality reduction algorithm called t-SNE and UMAP to classify 2061 Fermi GRBs based on four observed quantities: duration, peak energy, fluence, and peak flux. The map results of t-SNE and UMAP show a clear division of these GRBs into two clusters. We mark the two clusters as GRBs-I and GRBs-II, and find that all GRBs associated with supernovae are classified as GRBs-II. It includes the peculiar short GRB 200826A, which was confirmed to originate from the death of a massive star. Furthermore, except for two extreme events GRB 211211A and GRB 230307A, all GRBs associated with kilonovae fall into GRBs-I population. By comparing to the traditional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
