The Effect of Grain Size Distribution on the Defect Generation Mechanism of 0201 Passives

TL;DR

This study investigates how grain size distribution in 0201 passive components influences defect formation, revealing microstructural differences among vendors and proposing manufacturing techniques to mitigate defects like tombstoning.

Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of grain morphology effects on defect mechanisms in 0201 resistors and suggests manufacturing adjustments to improve reliability.

Findings

Vendor A had smaller tin grains (2 microns) and higher grain size number (15).

Vendor B and C had larger grains (4 and 5 microns) with lower grain size numbers.

Using alternative plating solutions reduced grain size number and defect occurrence.

Abstract

The recent advancements in electronics manufacturing has necessitated the demand for miniaturization of electronic components. In particular, the product sizes for passive components have evolved from 1005 (1.0x0.5mm) which is roughly the size of a grain of sand to 0201 (0.25x0.125mm) which is 1/16th the size of a grain of sand. Grain size distribution and composition play a vital role in tailoring the demands for reliably shrinking dimension of passives. The study focuses on analyzing the effect of grain size and composition, which plays a significant role in maintaining high yield output during the manufacturing processes. The objective of this study is to compare the grain morphology and its effect on defect generation mechanism for 0201 resistors. The experimental setup was prepared to evaluate the grain structure as per ASTM E112-3 test standards. The 0201 resistor samples from three different vendors were assembled on test vehicle PCB (Printed Circuit Board). The resulting observations of the study showed that tombstoning defect was observed during the reflow process for Vendor A. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) results showed the presence of microstructural difference in the tin grain size of resistors. The tin grain size for Vendor A was observed to be 2 microns, whereas the grain size for Vendors B and C were 4 and 5 microns, respectively. Furthermore, the results of grain size measurements performed using the intercept method showed that a grain size number of 13 and 13.6 was observed for Vendors B and C, whereas a grain size number of 15 was observed for Vendor A. The second phase of the study focuses on techniques for improving the grain size number to mitigate the tombstoning defect. It was observed that using an alternate plating solution during the manufacturing of passives resulted in decreased grain size number while containing the tombstoning issue.