On the capability of high redshift kSZ measurement with galaxy surveys
Ziyang Chen (SJTU), Pengjie Zhang (SJTU)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of high redshift kSZ measurements using galaxy surveys, comparing stacking and tomography methods, and forecasts improvements with future CMB experiments.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of kSZ stacking and tomography methods at high redshifts, highlighting the advantages of tomography with upcoming surveys like PFS.
Findings
Higher redshift bins yield greater S/N in tomography due to increased electron density and survey volume.
kSZ tomography outperforms stacking in S/N, especially at high redshifts.
Next-generation CMB surveys could significantly enhance kSZ detection capabilities.
Abstract
The kSZ effect has been detected at z<1 using various techniques and data sets. The ongoing and upcoming spectroscopic galaxy surveys such as DESI and PFS will push the detection beyond z = 1, and therefore map the baryon distribution at high redshifts. Such detection can be achieved by both the kSZ stacking and tomography methods. While the two methods are theoretically equivalent, they differ significantly in the probed physics and scales, and required data sets. Taking the combination of PFS and ACT as an example, we build mocks of kSZ and galaxies, quantify the kSZ detection S/N, and compare between the two methods. We segment the PFS galaxies into three redshift bins: 0.6 < z < 1.0, 1.0 < z < 1.6, and 1.6 < z < 2.4. For tomography method, our analysis reveals that the two higher redshift bins exhibit higher S/N, with values of 32 and 28, respectively, compared to the first redshift…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
